.gif)
Explaining the Negreira Case
There's some controversy here, and I think the user just wants a straightforward explanation. I’ll outline key points: first, we need to discuss what “8 times” means—payments rose from around 70k to 550k. Real Madrid is questioning this increase. Barcelona claimed the payments were for technical reports, scouting, and arbitration. Laporta previously stated the payments started before him, continuing through Núñez and Gaspart, with claims he stopped them in 2009. However, payments may have persisted. I should avoid making assumptions and note we might lack current details.Clarifying the Negreira Case
I can offer to fetch exact figures if needed, but I should also mention that there are ongoing legal proceedings. Here are some key points:
Real Madrid, as the popular accusation, likely sent a questionnaire to Laporta, referencing Spanish media. The invoices to Dasnil 95 jumped from about 70k/year in the early 2000s to around 550k/year by 2016-2018, with noted increments in 2009, 2011, and 2016. Barcelona's public reasons included arbitration consultancy and expanded services, yet there's skepticism about the existence of deliverables amidst generic invoices. The increase coinciding with Negreira's departure adds to the doubts.Summarizing the Negreira Case
It appears that payments to Negreira ended in 2018, which raises some suspicion about the timing. Here’s a crisp Q&A format:
- Background: From 2001-2018, Barça paid around 7.3 million euros to Negreira and his company.
- The "8 times" jump: Annual payments increased from about 70k to over 550k, peaking around 2016.
- Real Madrid's questions: Focus on usage, contracts, decision-makers, annual price increases, bidding, and deliverables. 
- Laporta's public defense: He maintained the payments were for legitimate services and claimed he wasn’t involved in the price hikes during his tenure.
- Legal progress: The case has reached trial preparation, questioning whether it constitutes sports corruption or commercial bribery.
I’ll be cautious with details.
以下是要点，便于快速了解这条“8倍”质问背后的来龙去脉：
基本情况：司法材料与媒体公开信息显示，2001—2018年间，巴萨向前西足协裁判委员会副主席内格雷拉及其公司支付合计约数百万欧元（常见口径约在700万欧左右）。年付款额在长期内持续上升。
“暴涨8倍”的含义：早期年度账目大致在数万欧/年级别，后期（尤其2016—2018年前后）增至约五十多万欧/年，量级接近早期的数倍增长。具体年份与精确数额以法院与税务口径为准，但媒体普遍以“约8倍”概括幅度。
皇马质问的核心：为何费用多年持续上调、涨幅巨大；涨价依据是什么；是否有正式合同、明细与可交付物；谁拍板决定；是否招标或比价；服务范围是否客观扩容到足以匹配涨价。
巴萨/拉波尔塔的公开说法（概括）：费用用于“裁判技术咨询、对手与裁判报告、视频与青训覆盖”等服务；否认影响或购买裁判判罚；称做法“行业存在过”的边缘服务；涨价与服务范围、物价和形式合规有关。拉波尔塔本人亦多次强调其第二任期与这些历史付款无直接关系，并指部分涨价发生在其前任/后任管理层期间。
质疑点与司法关注：多份发票描述笼统、原始交付材料缺失或难以核验；付款终止时间与内格雷拉离任时间点关系敏感；检方至今未公开指认“直接操纵具体比赛”的硬证，但将焦点放在长期结构性风险与合规缺口。
需要我把已公开的年度付款大致时间线和区间数做一张简表，或整理出皇马在诉讼程序中的具体问点清单和巴萨对应答复口径吗？